=========================================

– Delivered 4,000 babies, never lost a mother, never performed an

abortion, never lost a child.

– Is a practicing, Southern Baptist Christian

– Has TWO brothers that are practicing Christian ministers

– Supports Israel’s sovereignty and Independence from foreign influence

and their right to defend themselves

– Is Morally opposed to abortion and legally opposed to Roe V. Wade as it

pertains to state’s rights and Federal power

– Has NEVER voted for a tax increase

– Is opposed to pre-meditated mass murder through aggressive war and

invasion.

WHERE IS RON PAUL? WHO IS RON PAUL?

What do YOU … believe?

========================================

Not a bad sentiment… and some of it is true. However, fighting for the cause of Ron Paul and liberty, we can’t be caught spreading half truths, lies, or deception just to swing sentiment in our favor. I actually just about reposted it to my wall before I spotted something terribly false in the first statement. So I left a message on this fellow Ron Paul supporters post “Several children were lost under Ron Paul’s practice… Some times there is nothing anyone can do, not even Dr. Paul. He never charged a family if they lost their child though, that does set him apart from other doctors.” The admin of the page deleted the post… but not before accusing me of lies, deception, and having no proof for my horrendous claim and attempt to smear Ron Paul’s name. I found it a little bit odd but felt the need to reply again, with some “evidence” I had seen earlier in the campaign that supports what I just said.

Do you really believe that since 1969 when Dr. Paul opened his clinic he never saw a “still born” child? Really? You believe it so much to not even give time for someone to respond before you delete their comments?

The first statement of this cannot be validated. It’s a good sentiment and if you shorten it to “-Delivered 4,000+ babies, and never performed an abortion” it would be true. He’s said many times that he’s never found a case where performing an abortion would save the mothers life (as many left wing folks claim is so frequently necessary… or at least they bring it up as an example every time abortion bans are brought up). Doesn’t mean he never lost a child, or necessarily that he never lost a mother. I don’t have any documentation on whether or not he ever lost a mother, patient doctor confidentiality blocks those records, as you would hope that they would. I do have a testimony from a man who had a still born child under Dr. Paul’s care… which would make your ridiculous effort to cover up the truth naive, foolish, and counter productive towards the Ron Paul Revolution. You should never fear truth… truth can only do harm to those who have been dishonest.

http://www.youtube.com/​watch?v=8Rv0Z5SNrF4

So maybe I was a little bit harsh in the reply, but also didn’t find it necessary for a supposed truth lover to accuse me of hating truth before deleting my post.

Get your very own stylish mocking jay pin from the hunger games movie while supplies last.

Nah, too many people prefer to be employees. Stability beats opportunity.

My response:

There is only stability in corporatism because it has rooted itself in our lives over the last 400 years. When EIC was first established it had its hard times, many believed that the corporate world would never survive because it would be the death of creativity. Back then people lived and died on creativity, if you weren’t creative you were a beggar in the gutter. No one understood how you could increase value without creativity, except a few men who first pitched the multi-million dollar loan to the bank of England. After less than a year of operation they went back to a large central European bank for a bailout (once again worth millions of dollars, and over 400 years ago). EIC ended up successful in their endeavor to squeeze value out of time. On average the corporate world has managed to squeeze a 4% value increase out of their work force every year, compounding, for the last 400 years. Wal-Mart was the most successful at leveraging local governments (that gave them free land just to have the opportunity for them to build there), state governments (that often gave them 0 taxes for up to 10 years for building new stores), federal governments (both US and China that helped to subsidize their manufacture and shipping costs). The success of Wal-Mart forced other corporations to keep up, then the house of cards started to crumble in the late 90′s. It’s a little known story, but the corporate world has been slipping for nearly 15 years now… it’s why over 11,000 new pages of law are added to the books every year. Corporations are trying to keep themselves relevant with the forceful arm of their conglomerate (the government). However, the government is broke… so people have to go somewhere.

It is unlikely that any of us will see in our lifetime the full potential of collaborative efforts… There is a lot that must happen before we do.

I do agree with you most people just want to be told what to do. Before the corporate world we had the feudal lord system, both center around a few people telling large groups of people what to do. These small businesses that emerge in the collaborative effort will need workers to update their sites, pick up supplies, deliver finished goods, etc. But I really think we’re headed away from the corporate world, and more into an artist driven collaborative approach.

What makes me think this? Well, the world is shifting towards collaborative efforts for proof just look to Torrents, eBay, Pinterest, Google AdWords, Etsy, Prosper, heck even the large corporate retail shops allow small independent contractors to sell through their sites (Amazon, NewEgg). It’s easier now for a person to make money from home than ever… and do so with creative designs. In the corporate model efficiency of design and building was key this next wave is going to be seen as a rebirth of creativity and art in the items we use daily. While most of these efforts are still very small independent groups of 1 or 2 people making a living off of one larger corporate site… that’s about to change. Once we establish a place for people to collaborate and work on their projects together for example in vehicular manufacturing from home it will need to be a conglomeration of engineers, tradesmen, financiers, etc. But we’ve already seen this established with some open source car designs that are being build… just small scale… once it goes larger scale we’ll start seeing the big government, big business model die out.